Most people think choosing a franchise starts with a brand they already love. Matt Stevens, known nationally as The Franchise Guy, believes it should start somewhere else entirely. On the Wealth Architect Podcast with host Mark Yegge, Matt breaks down how to choose the right franchise: starting with your own goals and lifestyle first, then working backward to the systems, the numbers, and the questions that actually matter.
Key Takeaways from This Episode
- Matt Stevens has placed more than 900 people into franchises, with investments ranging from $30,000 to mid-eight figures.
- Franchisors who work with a consultant see closing rates increase 6 to 16 times over open advertising alone.
- The matching process starts with the candidate’s ownership criteria and desired outcomes, not with a list of brand names.
- There are roughly 4,300 franchise opportunities available, spanning far more industries than most buyers realize.
- Candidates typically speak with at least three franchise owners before eliminating a brand, and at least six before saying yes.
- Franchise investment ranges vary enormously. Chick-fil-A’s franchise fee is about $10,000 because the franchisor controls nearly everything, while most equity-based systems require high six figures to seven figures.
- The biggest risk in franchising is behavioral. Believing the business will run itself is the mistake Matt sees most often.
- Franchise ownership is not one-size-fits-all. Options range from full-time 60 to 70 hour commitments to semi-active ownership models.
What The Franchise Guy Actually Does
Matt Stevens’ franchise story goes back to 1987, when he joined a predecessor to what is now a painting franchise system worth well over a billion dollars, with roughly 500 operations today. At the time, he was one of about 67 to 70 franchisees spread across Canada and New England. He was 20 years old in his first business, and by the time he was 23 he had logged 15,000 labor hours in the industry, learning how to bill, how to be reliable to customers and employees, and how to run a business the hard way, in real time.
He stayed on that path for three years as a franchisor employee, but the travel took its toll. He was on the road for the first three years of his oldest daughter’s life, and he decided something had to change. A friend introduced him to franchise consulting, and he has been in the industry for 25 years since, describing himself simply as Match.com for franchising.
The Franchise Guy exists to help great franchisors find the right candidates, and to help great candidates find the right franchisors. Without that kind of matching, franchisors advertising on their own typically sign somewhere between 1 out of 200 applicants and 2 out of 100 applicants. When a franchise consultant is involved and brings the right candidate to the right opportunity, closing rates increase 6 to 16 times over.
Why Ownership Criteria Come Before Brand Names
Matt does not start a candidate conversation by pulling up a list of franchise brands. He starts by wiping the slate clean and talking through ownership criteria and desired outcomes: what does the candidate want their life to look like down the road, and why does that picture matter to them. Only after establishing the “what” and the “why” does he move to the “how.”
From there, he measures candidates against roughly two dozen to 30 ownership criteria: access to capital, tolerance for labor hours, how long they can wait before generating income, who they want to manage, what days they want their location open, who they want their customer to be, and why a particular industry appeals to them in the first place. Evaluating a franchise opportunity this way, criteria first and brand second, is what separates a deliberate buyer from someone chasing a name they already recognize. With roughly 4,300 franchise opportunities on the market, most of them never cross a typical buyer’s radar until someone narrows the field for them.
How Franchise Due Diligence Actually Works
Once Matt has a shortlist of “standing opportunities” for a candidate, the real research begins. Candidates learn everything they can about the franchisor and its franchisees, get access to territory information, and get Q&A time with individual owners or in group settings. Matt tells candidates to expect three weeks to three months to reach a decision, whether that decision is a yes on one opportunity or a no on all of them. Eliminating every option on the list is a perfectly acceptable outcome of the process.
The most important part of that research is talking to current and former franchise owners directly, and asking nosy questions: what are they doing differently, why, have they deviated from the franchisor’s playbook and did that help or hurt, and what would they change if they started over. Matt’s rule of thumb is that candidates should speak with at least three owners before eliminating a brand, and at least six before saying yes, since after six conversations the answers tend to repeat. He has had candidates speak with 29 or more owners before committing. The full franchise buying process ultimately comes down to one question every candidate has to answer honestly: am I ready, willing, and able to do what the successful people in this system are doing to get the results I want to replicate.
What a Franchise Investment Really Costs
Franchise fees and investment levels vary far more than most first-time buyers expect. Chick-fil-A is the extreme example Matt points to: the franchise fee is about $10,000, among the lowest in franchising, because Chick-fil-A controls nearly every major decision, including site selection, location, and advertising. The franchisee simply operates the store. That structure is also one of the most competitive in franchising, with roughly 10,000 applications a year for only 70 to 75 open locations. 7-Eleven follows a similar model, with the franchisor owning the property and making most of the decisions.
Most of Matt’s candidates want equity instead, and the majority of franchise systems are built to offer it. For those systems, the investment is typically high six figures at minimum, often reaching seven figures, and it can take 9 to 15 months to actually open the doors, sometimes 18 months or longer. Understanding what it really costs to buy a franchise means looking past the headline fee and into the full investment range, the timeline, and what level of control comes with it.
The Real Benefits of Buying Into a Proven System
Matt has placed more than 900 people into franchises, with investments ranging from $30,000 up into the mid-eight figures, though most land in the high five to low seven figure range. None of them needed a franchise to build the business they ended up building. They chose one for specific reasons. First, community: franchise owners are surrounded by like-minded people working toward similar goals. Second, inherited experience: candidates absorb the lessons other franchisees have already learned the hard way, through training and ongoing operations support, without having to relearn them through their own costly mistakes.
Third, the system itself: owners follow a documented template instead of building operations from scratch and living through every mistake that entails. Fourth, economies of scale. Matt’s own experience in the painting industry is the clearest example: a piece of direct marketing sent to a likely customer cost franchisees roughly $0.44 through the franchisor’s bulk purchasing power, compared to close to $2 if he had produced it on his own. For candidates in their 40s and 50s in particular, a franchise consulting relationship compresses a multi-year learning curve into months rather than years.
What Can Go Wrong, and How to Manage the Risk
Franchising reduces risk, but it does not eliminate it. Some risk is simply outside anyone’s control, like a city tearing up the street in front of a location to replace a sewer line and cutting off front-door access for three to six months. Most risk, though, is behavior-driven. The biggest mistake Matt sees is a new owner believing the business will run itself. It never does. Someone has to pay attention to the daily outcomes, whether that is the owner personally or someone the owner hires and incentivizes, sometimes with phantom equity or other rewards, to run it on their behalf.
That is exactly where semi-absentee franchise ownership comes in for buyers who want the upside of franchise ownership without being on-site every day. It is one more reason ownership criteria, including how hands-on a buyer actually wants to be, need to be established before a brand is ever chosen.
Finding the Franchise That Fits Your Life
Some of Matt’s favorite placements illustrate just how wide the range of franchise ownership really is. One candidate lives off the grid, generating his own electricity from solar and heating his home with wood, and has run a very successful, mid to high range net income franchise for nine years, closing in on his ten-year anniversary. Another candidate bought franchises in North Dakota, Minnesota, and Florida with the explicit goal of building five or more locations and then stepping back, using the eventual sale as his retirement package.
Those examples reflect the full range of commitment levels available in franchising: some systems suit owners who want to invest 60 to 70 hours a week, others suit a more typical 30 to 40 hour workweek, and others are built for semi-active ownership, run through a manager or team while the owner stays involved from a distance. The common thread, in Matt’s words, is what candidates are actually building toward.
“We find the ones that are a fit for those who really like that opportunity and want to build wealth and what I call the freedoms of time, money, people, and purpose.”
Matt Stevens, Wealth Architect PodcastBuyers who want help finding that fit for their own life, rather than guessing based on a brand they already recognize, can start the process of becoming a franchise owner with a straightforward first step: a conversation about their own goals. Reach out to Matt directly to talk through which categories, investment levels, and time commitments actually fit your life.
Matt Stevens — The Franchise Guy
Independent Franchise Consultant · 30+ Years Industry Experience · 4 Businesses Owned · 500+ Franchisees Placed Nationally
Matt Stevens is one of the most experienced independent franchise consultants in the United States, based in Dublin, Ohio. Since the mid-1990s he has guided hundreds of buyers into franchise ownership across nearly all 50 states — at no cost to the buyer. Learn more about Matt →
Published: | Last Updated: | LinkedIn
Frequently Asked Questions
A franchise consultant matches candidates to franchise systems based on their goals, lifestyle, and investment level, rather than steering them toward a single preferred brand. Matt Stevens describes his role simply as Match.com for franchising: he works with franchisors to find the right candidates and works with candidates to find the right franchisors. Because he learns both sides in depth, he can flag mismatches before money changes hands. Franchisors advertising without that kind of matching typically close only 1 out of 200 to 2 out of 100 applicants; working with the right consultant can increase closing rates 6 to 16 times over.
It starts with the candidate, not with a list of franchise brands. Matt begins by setting aside any specific franchises the candidate already has in mind and instead talks through their desired outcomes: what they want their life to look like, and why. From there he measures the candidate against roughly two dozen to 30 ownership criteria, including access to capital, tolerance for labor hours, income timeline expectations, who they want to manage, what days they want their business open, and why a given industry appeals to them. Only after that picture is clear does he bring specific franchise opportunities into the conversation.
There are roughly 4,300 franchise opportunities available, and only a small number are typically available for purchase in any one buyer’s territory at a given time. Most people default to a franchise they already know from advertising or a friend’s experience, without realizing how many other options exist across dozens of industries. Part of a consultant’s job is narrowing that full field down to a short list of opportunities that actually match the candidate’s own criteria, rather than leaving the candidate to search through thousands of options alone.
Franchisors who rely only on open advertising, such as online ads, magazines, or home shows, typically close somewhere between 1 out of 200 applicants and 2 out of 100 applicants. When a consultant brings a pre-matched, well-suited candidate instead, closing rates increase 6 to 16 times over. That improvement works both ways: a consultant who brings the wrong candidate to a franchisor, or the wrong franchisor to a candidate, hears about it directly, which keeps the incentive aligned toward genuine fit rather than volume.
It varies enormously. Matt Stevens has placed candidates into franchises ranging from $30,000 investments up to mid-eight figures, though most of his candidates land in the high five to low seven figure range. Systems that offer the franchisee equity, which is what most of Matt’s candidates want, typically require a high six figure investment at minimum, often reaching into seven figures. Lower-fee models exist too, but they usually trade a smaller upfront cost for less control, since the franchisor retains more decision-making power.
Chick-fil-A’s franchise fee is about $10,000, among the lowest fees in franchising, because Chick-fil-A controls nearly everything else: site selection, location decisions, and advertising. The franchisee’s role is essentially to operate the store rather than to build or capitalize it the way most franchise owners do. That low barrier to entry also makes it one of the most competitive systems to get into, with roughly 10,000 applications a year for only 70 to 75 open locations, a ratio Matt compares to getting into an elite university.
For equity-based franchises, the typical timeline from a yes decision to opening the doors is 9 to 15 months, and it is not unusual for it to stretch to 18 months or longer for a location-based business. That timeline covers site selection, buildout, training, and everything else required to actually launch, which is one more reason Matt encourages candidates to think through their financial and personal timeline before committing rather than assuming the business will be generating income right away.
Beyond training and systems, franchise owners benefit from economies of scale that are difficult to replicate independently. Matt’s own experience in the painting industry is a clear example: a piece of direct marketing that cost franchisees roughly $0.44 to produce and mail through the franchisor’s bulk purchasing power would have cost him close to $2 to produce on his own. Multiplied across every marketing piece, training resource, and vendor relationship a franchisor negotiates on behalf of its network, that purchasing power adds up to a real financial advantage for individual owners.
Start with your own criteria before you start comparing brands: how many hours a week you actually want to work, how hands-on you want to be, and what you want the business to make possible for your life. Matt has placed candidates who work 60 to 70 hours a week, candidates who keep to a normal 30 to 40 hour week, and candidates who run their franchise semi-actively through a manager, including one owner who lives off the grid and has run a very successful franchise for nine years. The right franchise is the one that matches your own criteria, not the one with the most name recognition.
Ask the nosy questions. Find out what franchise owners are doing day to day, why they are doing it that way, whether they have deviated from the franchisor’s success plan and whether that helped or hurt them, and what they would change if they were starting over. Matt’s rule is to speak with at least three owners before eliminating a franchise from consideration, and at least six before saying yes, since after six conversations the answers tend to repeat. Some of his candidates have spoken with 29 or more owners before making a final decision.
Some risk is genuinely outside an owner’s control, such as a city construction project that cuts off access to a storefront for months at a time. But Matt says most problems are behavior-driven, and the biggest one is a new owner assuming the franchise will run itself. It never does. Someone has to pay attention to the business every day, whether that is the owner or someone the owner hires and incentivizes to manage it on their behalf. Franchising reduces the risk of starting a business from scratch, but it does not remove the need for active oversight.
Yes. Matt describes franchise ownership as existing on a spectrum: some systems suit owners who want to put in 60 to 70 hours a week, others suit a more typical 30 to 40 hour workweek, and others are built for semi-active ownership, where a manager or team runs day-to-day operations while the owner stays involved from a distance. The right level of involvement is one of the ownership criteria that should be established early, since it directly shapes which franchise categories and systems will actually be a fit.
Ready to Find the Right Franchise for Your Life?
Matt Stevens has guided 500-plus buyers into franchise ownership at no cost to the buyer. Start the conversation and find out which categories fit your goals, your investment range, and your schedule.
Talk to Matt. It’s Free


